User talk:Wabid

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Tandem generator, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://www.freepatentsonline.com/4476395.html, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Tandem generator and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Tandem generator with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Tandem generator.

It is also important that the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and that it follows Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at Talk:Tandem generator/Temp. Leave a note at Talk:Tandem generator saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! The freepatentsonline copying policy is on [1] - it does NOT permit redistribution. Alvestrand 09:43, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Summary of political positions of Ron Paul

This article youcreated seems to be a duplicate of Political positions of Ron Paul I do not think there is a need for a duplicate summary article; articles are usually summarised in their lead section. Do you intend for the article to eventually replace Political positions of Ron Paul, in that case it would make more sense to just edit that article, although if you wish to make major changes it might be better to bring it up on the talk page of the article first. Regards, Guest9999 (talk) 21:36, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I believe the original article to be too technical, and too long for an average viewsrs read. I would hope that if one was made for all candidates, it would benefit some type of grid view comparing stances in detail, without being too hard to abrupt. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wabid (talk • contribs)

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Summary of political positions of Ron Paul, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you.--Newsroom hierarchies (talk) 19:56, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Summary of political positions of Ron Paul

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Summary of political positions of Ron Paul, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 19:44, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As per the comments above that this is a duplicate article, I have proposed that this article be deleted, which it will be in five days if no one objects. If they do, it will probably go to WP:AfD for a community discussion, where it will almost certainly be deleted.

You should feel free to edit the main page, Political positions of Ron Paul. Almost all of the RP articles could stand to be edited down considerably, in my opinion.--Newsroom hierarchies (talk) 19:56, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]